[43]                               home                            [44]

ORB Visualization

(soon)

 

National Knowledge Project

Return to Comment Bead

 

There have arisen three main philosophies, or schools of thought, concerning the foundations of mathematics the so-called logistic, intuitionist, and formalist schools.

 

Russell and Whitehead’s logistic thesis was that mathematics is a branch of logic. Rather than being just a tool of mathematics, logic becomes the progenitor of mathematics. All mathematical concepts are to be formulated in terms of logical concepts, and all theorems of mathematics are to be developed as theorems of logic; the distinction between mathematics and logic become merely one of practical convenience.

 

The Brower intuitionist thesis is that mathematics is to be built solely by finite constructive methods in the intuitively given sequence of natural numbers.  According to this view, then, at the very base of mathematics lies a primitive intuition, allied, no doubt, to our temporal sense of before and after, that allows us to conceive a single object, then one more, then one more, and so on endlessly. For the intuitionists, a set cannot be thought of as a ready-made collection, but must be considered as a law by means of which the elements of the set can be constructed in a step-by-step fashion.

 

The Hilbert formalist thesis is that mathematics is concerned with formal symbolic systems.  In fact, mathematics is regarded as a collection of such abstract developments, in which the terms are mere symbols and the statements are formulas involving these symbols; the ultimate base of mathematics does not lie in logic but only in a collection of pre-logical marks or symbols and in a set of operations with these marks.  Since, from this point of view, mathematics is devoid of concrete content and contains only ideal symbolic elements, the establishment of the consistency of the various branches of mathematics becomes an important and necessary part of the formalist program.