Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Resilience Project White Paper
(Response to note from The
Speaker’s Office [376] )
(Response ŕ to [376] )
Starting the Discussion with the National Science Foundation
About the proposed Resilience Project
Correspondence: from
Stuart Robbins
Stuart and colleagues,
I am pointing to your resume as
an introduction to others
http://www.srobbinsconsulting.com/docs/SR.resume.pdf
and welcome you to the
discussion.
I see your premise about the
mirror that IT is for the "developers of the software".
Excellent point.
The premise of the "second
school" is that this mirror is not a mirror on natural information
scientists or humanity as a whole but is the mirror on a specific kind of human
being.
The characterization of
"computer scientists", "computer programmers" and
"business innovators in the software sector" should include
"dedication", " moral individuals" etc. However, the
science that should be behind information technology is not well mirrored in
the past generations of information technology. Nor are the natural
behaviors of everyday human activities.
We have asked "why" and
we have found answers that have to do with misplaced economic rewards due to
monopolies and other forms of hidden power.
http://www.ontologystream.com/beads/nationalDebate/381.htm
http://www.ontologystream.com/beads/nationalDebate/385.htm
This is a fundamental problem
that can be addressed if a group of natural scientists and business
entrepreneurs work together to present the full spectrum of issues to the
Speaker, if she will receive us.
It is also possible to approach
transformation using new models for bringing venture capital to those elements
of the transformation that have been identified but have not been funded as of
yet. (The perceived fact is that the capitalization system is also
broken.)
CoreSystem might be compared with
a masterpiece musical composition, which I have been allowed to enjoy and
appreciate. Because this work is so advanced, in comparison to a system
like Vista, it is possible for me to recommend CoreSystem as a part of the
Resilience Project. The other parts may include a type of evolutionary
system for advanced pattern recognition algorithms, as was proposed in the
Knowledge Sharing Core:
http://www.bcngroup.org/area2/knowledgeSharingFoundation.htm
Paul Prueitt
505-613-2108
Sandy's short description is very
good, and is directed at his bid to have CoreSystem inserted at the
foundational layer of the Internet. If the Resilience Project was funded
at the level we are requesting (2 - 10 B per year), the foundational layer of a
new Internet would (likely) be based on CoreSystem. There are some design
differences in the two implementation strategies.
The peer review of CoreSystem has
already at least partially occurred. However, a full implementation is
really necessary in order to demonstrate what can not be demonstrated only in
simulation.
My personally opinion is that a
SOA type (service oriented architecture) standard for all processes supporting
educational entities (at what ever level) could use the design principles of
CoreSystem as a means to illustrate the type of mirroring of the education
community world wide, if they were allowed to use a dedicated system based on
what I understand about CoreSystem.
These are exciting possibilities,
but now we are facing the pragmatics of our particular historical setting.
Resilience Project White Paper
Note sent January 29th ŕ [382]
January 30th reply from NSF ŕ [383]