(bridge) Send note to
Paul Prueitt .
(back
to SBF3)
We ask that
comments and discussion on this series be made in the Yahoo
groups from, eventChemistry.
AP1 – On
enumeration by the human of the cell values over an event class
AP2– Minimal
Voting Procedure
AP3 – Using the
MVP to rout information
AP4 – Using eventChemistry to improve the
framework specification
Action Perception Cycles 1
On
enumeration by the human of the cell values over an event class
In SBF3
we considered the
Domain space = { E l | l = 1,
. . . , 100 }
described
by the 1900 individual data pieces
{ < a(0), a(1),
a(2), . . . , a(18) > l | l = 1, . . . , 100 }
that are created by completely filling out the SB-Framework’s 18 cell
and 1 name tag for each of the 100 events.
The Sowa-Ballard Framework
{ independent, relative,
mediating }
{ physical, abstract }
{ occurrent, continuant,
universal }
is considered to be more general than the Zachman Framework. Either one of these frameworks can be learned, by almost anyone, in a few hours. One gets used to thinking about “relative physical universal” as “interaction, which is the (2,1,3) cell of the Ballard Framework, for example. In using the Zachman Framework one actually has guidance form the Zachman Institute and from several published books. A clerk whose job it is to develop enumerations of frameworks simply gets good at converting tacit knowledge into what is then processed to become the designated structural coupling between events.
The process of enumerating the
cell values for 100 events might take a day or two if the human is familiar with
the events. These events can literally
be anything, individual text reports or events that have caused a crisis
management group to assemble.
The events might even be some
event in computational space, such as database accesses, and the cells might be
automatically populated by first order logics (consisting of if then
expressions) and something like a Petri net.
But we are focusing on the case where the Generalized Framework is
presented to a human as part of a knowledge elicitation process.
Figure 1: The process flow model of human memory formation, storage
and use.
In the case that we have a human in the loop,
we have an extension of the model of human memory, awareness and anticipation that
Prueitt has derived from basic
research in behavioral
cognitive science. Once this model
is achieved, then one is free to use the tri-level architecture specified in
the book “Foundation of Knowledge Management”, by Prueitt, in press) and in
particular to use the minimal
voting procedure invented by Prueitt in 1996.
(bridge) Comments
can be sent to ontologyStream e-forum . (back to SBF3)